Weezha Roz-Mousa Abu Marzouk, a member of Hamas’ Political Bureau based in Qatar, has announced Hamas’ readiness to engage in talks with the newly established U.S. government.
He stated that the group is ready to discuss all issues with the U.S. and reach an agreement.
In an interview with The New York Times, he described Donald Trump as a “serious” president and added that if it weren’t for his insistence, a ceasefire agreement between Hamas and Israel would not have been reached.
The relationship between the United States and Hamas is complex and shaped by political, security, and regional factors.
The U.S. has designated Hamas as a terrorist organization since 1997, and there are no official communications or diplomatic ties with the group.
However, the U.S. does engage indirectly with Hamas through intermediaries like Egypt or Qatar, especially regarding humanitarian issues and peace processes.
1. U.S. Stance on Hamas:
The U.S. has always opposed Hamas’ actions, particularly its attacks on Israel, and supports Israel’s security.
The U.S. views Hamas as a major destabilizing force in the region.
2. Indirect Communication:
While there is no direct communication, the U.S. uses countries like Egypt and Qatar to indirectly reach out to Hamas, particularly on humanitarian aid and political developments.
3. Support for Palestinian Rights:
Despite its position on Hamas, the U.S. supports Palestinian self-determination but insists that peace talks should involve the Palestinian Authority, not Hamas, due to its violent stance.
4. Anti-Hamas Measures:
The U.S. has imposed financial sanctions on Hamas and works to isolate the group internationally, weakening its operational capacity.
5. Regional Influence:
U.S. policies are influenced by broader regional dynamics, including Iran’s support for Hamas and the mediation role of Arab countries in peace efforts.
In conclusion, U.S.-Hamas relations are defined by opposition and tension, with indirect engagement primarily focusing on humanitarian issues.
Global and regional political factors may influence potential shifts in this relationship, but formal or positive relations remain unlikely unless there is a significant change in Hamas’ policies.
Weezha Roz
